Earlier today, Atlantic blogger Megan McArdle argued that Stupak-Pitts isn’t that bad , and it certainly isn’t bad enough to derail health care reform over. What’s scary isn’t McArdle’s pragmatic position – it’s the anti-choice dogma wrapped around her words. McArdle seems to have a low opinion of the various opinions put forth against Stupak, writing: Most of them seem to come from feminists who blithely assume away concerns about the personhood of the fetus, and the staunch political opposition to subsidized abortion from those who lean towards the “person” side. This allows them to spend 1,000 words or so having a completely…
